Leica Summilux 50mm f1.4 ASPH – Too Perfect to Own
Leica Summilux 50mm f1.4 ASPH - Too Perfect to Own
Lens Review
Leica Summilux 50mm f1.4 ASPH – Too Perfect to Own
Leica Summilux 50/1.4 ASPH
Leica Summilux 50mm f1.4 ASPH probably has the best bokeh, and sometimes I mistake it with Noctilux 50mm f0.95. Having the same tone and contrast, some say the Noctilux 50mm f0.95 is just the enlarged version of it. I would say it is too perfect to own, meaning it can be too clinical, but it also has all the best features in one.
Leica Summilux 50mm f1.4 V2, the second version in the lux series, is probably one of the best 50mm with an aperture at f/1.4. However, I had a crush on this Summilux 50mm f1.4 ASPH in 2011 and bought it in 2020. I sold it after a year because that copy had some front-focusing issues. So far, I have tried 3 different versions, and I know the third version, “Pre-asph” E46, is also very nice, but I heard about the optics separation issue due to the glue used by Leica. I try to avoid that. Before I made this post, I repurchased this lens a week ago. I spent weeks looking at the images from my last copy and photos posted online and decided to get it (again)!
50mm Summilux versions Differences
- Version 1, Filter size 43mm, Vented clip on hood, MFD 1 metre
- Version 2, Filter size 43mm, Vented clip on hood, MFD 1 metre
- Version 3 (aka Pre-a / Pre-asph), Filter size 46mm, Internal hood (built-in), MFD 0.7 metre
- Version 4 (aka ASPH), Filter size 46mm, Internal hood (built-in), MFD 0.7 metre
Built Quality and Compactness (Pros and Cons)
I must say the lens is beautifully constructed and solid. I like how Leica use deep yellow/orange paint in the focus scale. It has a build-in internal hood. You can contract and extend it quickly and turn it to lock it. The hood design is fantastic, but I would like to have it like Summicron 50mm f2 APO. Where the invention is an integrated hood (screw-out) like how you unscrew the cap of a bottle of water.
Cosmetically, I think Voigtlander has a better paint job than Leica. Comparing Voigtlander 50mm f2 APO Lanthar, the paint is so durable that it would not easily make any paint off. Leica modern lenses, in general, are pretty easy to have paint loss. 46mm filter thread makes it easier to find a colour filter or even a softer one if you want to use it to create a different look.
Another minor complaint would be the aperture blade, its shape at f/2.0 is not round, so images taken at f2 would have bokeh like a ninja star. It also has 6 bits coded which means your Leica M digital camera can recognise the lens on your camera body.
Similar to Summilux 35mm f1.4 ASPH FLE has its focusing tab, Summilux 50 asph also has a nice focusing tab to add precision when you focus. Like Summilux 35/1.4 FLE, it also has a floating element (FLE) to correct any focus shifts.
Closer Focus; 0.3 Metres Makes the Difference
Leica Summilux 50mm version 2 is excellent. It could be more perfect if it could focus at 0.7m! The ability to focus down to 0.7m is a competitive advantage for this lens, making it ideal as an all-rounder lens for travelling, portraits and daily documentary work. However, being able to focus at 0.7 metres means your portrait image will lose perspective, but the good side is at 0.7m. Your bokeh is kind of like Noctilux 50mm 0.95 ASPH!.
Creamy Bokeh with 3D Rendition Like Noctilux
At f/1.4, this lens renders creamy bokeh and clinical. No distortion and outstanding sharpness but not razor sharp at wide open. Lack of character, I would say, because it can deliver a technically lovely image. My friends always send me photos and ask me which lens was used to capture them, but the Summilux 50mm ASPH was probably the one I couldn’t guess right. Bokeh is a little bit too smooth and perfect. Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f1.2 VM is an alternative and renders comparable performance with this lens if you want a more friendly option.
Having floating elements means you need to be super precise when focusing. It is very noticeable if you run over the focus point. It has one aspherical surface creating super sharpness when stopping from f2.8 to f8.
At f/8.0, it is super sharp and creates a great atmosphere and clear image, especially for street and landscape photography.
50mm Summilux or Summicron Myth
Personally, I think Summicron offers better sharpness and compactness than Summilux. Bokeh is more pleasant with Summicron than Lux. Summicron is suitable for those who want to create images that have more details and include more textures, including the subject and background. I would describe the bokeh of summicron as using a smaller paint brush to portray what you see. Summilux, in contrast, uses a palette knife putting layers of paint on the background to give you a creamy experience. If we are talking about mood and character, one extra stop allows more light for you to do some street photography at night or in other low-light situations. I always use Noctilux or Summicron rather than my Summilux because I am okay with accepting heavyweight with my Noctilux to render great separations in my subject with a thin depth of field.
If you can afford a Noctilux and don’t mind its bulkiness, go for it, and you will love it!
Digital Performance
Overall, It is an outstanding performer on digital M cameras. It was used on Leica M9-P, M10 and M10-P and worked well with digital sensors.
Film Performance
This lens can produce really crisp and sharp film images. I would not say this lens is not the best for film lovers because it is too sharp to give that natural film look (the subject will be too sharp, and the grain structure will be harsh). However, if you like good definition and sharpness, Summilux 50 asph is your great company.
Conclusions
Although this lens has everything in one, bokeh, compactness, sharpness, contrast and good looking. The cold hard truth is I just never create a bond with it. Mainly because when I pick the lens I want to use, I will choose V2 over this ASPH.
Everything seems too good on this Summilux ASPH lens. I think it is suitable for people who want to upgrade to Noctilux later or those who want to just keep one daily lens. If you like film and digital images to have particular contrast and sharpness, I think you will love this lens!
One final tip I would recommend everyone to test is the lens focusing. Make sure the lens rangefinder coupling focuses accurately on your camera body before you walk away from the store. I had a bad experience with my first copy and now own my third one. If you can get the focus right, this lens is truly stellar!
Photography Techniques and Skills
Are you new to this photography world? If you are about to your photography journey or finding the right place to take a step further in photography techniques. Check out my videos!
Looking for Cameras / Lenses or Gears?
Support this Community
Recent Posts
Solo Exhibition – We Have Seen Better Days
Travelling through Scotland: Reflx Lab’s 120 Kodak Vision 3 50D with Pentax 67II
A Conversation with a Pro – Why Film Photography is Still So Attractive
New addition Voigtlander 35mm f/1.5 Asph VM Lens and Its Sleek Square Hood
The Widelux F8: My Unexpected Creative Companion
Joining the Bicep Club: My Rollercoaster Ride with the new Pentax 67II
8 Comments
Leave a comment
You are way off the mark saying the Summilux has no character. Wide open its rendering is so distinct that you can tell it apart from countless other lenses in a blind test. Just because a lens doesn’t have vintage busy bokeh, it doesn’t mean it has no character.
Hey there, really appreciate the comment and totally respect that everyone has their own opinion and preferences. The review I did is personal, purely based on my photography style and then to see how much this lens fit with that.
I am a testing nerd by nature and always try take samples to see what’s the best that I can get out of them. I tested with multiple lenses and did a comparison between them, it renders beautiful bokeh but I found it too good for my daily use (very sharp) and therefore titled it “too perfect to own”.
I agree with Anson. This lens is too perfect and after a while it gets boring because of that. JDow, I doubt that you can tell the Summlux apart from other modern ASPH lenses.
I agree with you on that this lens has plenty of characters, it surely isn’t a vintage lens character, but its own unique signature.
When shot wide open, the sharp fall off from in focus to out of focus area creates that strong so called 3d pop, and this lens has a lot of that, and sometimes it even makes the subject look it’s “stuck on”, whether you like the look or not is highly subjective, but that combined with the creamy bokeh( which does NOT completely melt away like modern “almost perfect” lenses, e.g. Sony 85mm GM) is its distinctive character, it separates itself from the rest of the modern aspheric lenses.
An apochromatic design sure makes a lens closer to being “perfect”, but in reality it is far from perfect. Mid zone dip, mushy corners wide open, etc..
That is not to discredit the writer, on the contrary, I appreciate the review, it provided me with a different view on this lens, thank you!
I have a m3, any viewfinder blockage with the summilux asp shot at close focus with hood on?
Hi Sam, there is no noticeable blockage at close focus with hood on.
I share your views on this lens. I prefer the v3 Summilux pre-asph by far. The pop up effect is becoming boring after a while and the lens has a too clinical rendering.
Thanks Cyril. I am doing some experimental shots with a Tiffen Black Pro Mist 1/4 and 1/8 on it.