Kodak Ektachrome 100D 5294 Colour Transparency Film 135
Kodak Ektachrome 100D 5294 Colour Transparency Film 135
Analog Film Review
Kodak Ektachrome 100D 5294 Colour Transparency Film 135
Numerous new film brands are flooding the analog film market, and I’m always apprehensive about trying them out. I don’t enjoy experimenting with unfamiliar films and ruining my overall film experience. Moreover, they are quite expensive these days. Since Ektachrome was discontinued in 2012, which carried the E100G and E100VS series, I eagerly awaited its return when Kodak announced it in December 2019. Finally, I could use Kodak’s colour reversal films again. As a result, I decided to use up all of my colour negative film stock in the fridge and stick to slide and black-and-white film only.
After trying a couple of Ektachrome E100 films, to be honest, it wasn’t the Ektachrome I remembered. Something seemed off to me, and the overall temperature was very cold and blue, which put me off, in addition to its expensive price tag. I needed to find exceptional warmth during sunset to utilise this film.
Finally, there’s the Kodak Ektachrome 100D 5294/7294, which is a motion picture film stock for daylight purposes and has exceptional sharpness at ISO 100. I was hoping for a better result. It shouldn’t have big difference to the Kodak Ektachrome E100. After shooting a few rolls, I’ve decided to use it more often as it performs much better than the E100 film I tried, maybe because it’s fresher. Technically based on the colour chart both are the same film. I would say it produces a much more pleasing result, but it’s not as contrasty or punchy as the Fujifilm Velvia 100.
100D Samples are shot with Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 ASPH M and Voigtlander 50mm f1.0 ASPH VM at box speed – 100 ISO.
Get the Latest Updates!
Stay up to date with my latest videos, photos, and news updates by following me on Instagram and YouTube. And don’t forget to subscribe to my website’s pop-up form or bottom of the page for exclusive updates and news. Head over to @tahusa on Instagram, subscribe to my YouTube channel, and stay in the loop!
What is Colour Reversal Film (Slide Film)?
Colour reversal film, also known as slide film or positive film, is a type of photographic film that produces a positive image on a transparent base. This means that the colours in the final image are directly and accurately represented, without the need for printing.
In contrast, colour negative film produces a negative image on an opaque base. This image must be printed or scanned to create a positive image with accurate colours.
One of the main benefits of using colour reversal film is its accurate colour representation. The colours in the final image are true to the original scene, with no colour shifts or alterations. This makes it a popular choice for professionals and enthusiasts who require high-quality, accurate colour representation in their images.
However, shooting with colour reversal film does require more precision and care than shooting with colour negative film. It is essential to have precise light readings and proper exposure settings to ensure that the final image has accurate colours and tones.
You may refer to this post for information on different film types.
Metering Accuracy
Slide film is known for its narrow dynamic range. When using slide or colour reversal film, it’s crucial to have precise light readings from your camera or handheld meter. You must be extremely careful when capturing your desired scene, as there is little room for error, and you can easily end up with over or underexposed shots. Slide film is often considered difficult to shoot, but with a bit of practice and a keen sense of lighting, it’s not as challenging as people make it out to be. Metering for the highlights is the best way to get the perfect shot. Another tip is to look for scenes with less dynamic range, such as strong light from the side or back. Additionally, shooting this film in bright sunlight yields the best results, unless you’re trying to create cinematic shots at night, in which case adequate lighting is essential. It’s like a plant – without light, there’s no good photosynthesis.
Character and Tone
Let’s take a closer look at the characteristics of this film. In situations with abundant sunlight, it performs exceptionally well – seeming to absorb all the light in its path! The warmth and energy emanating from the film are easily felt. However, it does present a bit of a challenge for me at times due to its powerful deep blue tone. The tonality tends to lean towards hues of yellow, blue, and green, with the colour green being particularly refreshing and rejuvenating, as seen in the photo below. Even when underexposed due to incorrect metering, it has a higher latitude than Fujifilm RDP III and Velvia. It’s best to shoot it at box speed, even when expired. Overall, this film is a different beast compared to colour negative film.
Ektachrome typically captures scenes in a manner that closely replicates how they appear to the naked eye. Nevertheless, when overexposed or when there are bright spots, the tones may shift towards cooler hues, while shadows may lean towards warmer tones. One interesting aspect of this film is its red tone, which is not vivid but rather muted. This is quite rare to find among existing film lineups. When shot indoors, the warmth it produces replicates the old Japanese colours from the 80s, similar to how Greg Girard captured Hong Kong and Tokyo.
Comparing Ektachrome Kodak 100D and E100
Although, I have mixed result between Kodak E100 and E100D, both are the same film stock based on the colour chart. The last batch of normal E100 that I shot in medium format looks fine with much closer rendering to the 5294. Maybe it’s the batch or lenses affected the results. If you wanna know more about E100, you may read this post.
In my opinion, I find the photos taken with 100D to be more predictable and appealing than those taken with E100. Some already confirmed that E100 and Ektachrome 5294 100D are the same film, I didn’t do any side by side comparison and it is based on my personal experience. Both are the exact same film stock but cutting process and perforation shape is different. What I find is that 100D has a warmer tone when you get enough sunlight in the exposures, making it easier for me to use during the day. Additionally, I find that the repackaged 100D is more economical than the E100. It reminds me of the old E100G, which I was quite fond of. But of course E100G and E100 aren’t comparable in the result as this is the only slide film that I could find made by Kodak.
Furthermore, I find that 100D has a unique character that sets it apart from other films. Its deep blue tone and refreshing green hues add a captivating dimension to my photos. I also appreciate the film’s interesting red tone, which is uncommon in other film lineups. This muted red tone provides a subtle and understated quality to my images, which I find quite appealing.
Another benefit of using 100D is its exceptional sharpness at ISO 100. This is particularly useful for capturing fine details and textures in my photos. Additionally, when shot correctly with proper light metering, 100D yields excellent results with vibrant colours and impressive contrast.
Overall, I believe that 100D offers a unique and compelling option for film photographers seeking warm, vibrant, and sharp images. Its distinct character and affordable price point make it a great alternative to other films, and I highly recommend giving it a try.
Furthermore, I find that 100D has a unique character that sets it apart from other films. Its deep blue tone and refreshing green hues add a captivating dimension to my photos. I also appreciate the film’s interesting red tone, which is uncommon in other film lineups. This muted red tone provides a subtle and understated quality to my images, which I find quite appealing.
Another benefit of using 100D is its exceptional sharpness at ISO 100. This is particularly useful for capturing fine details and textures in my photos. Additionally, when shot correctly with proper light metering, 100D yields excellent results with vibrant colours and impressive contrast.
Overall, I believe that 100D offers a unique and compelling option for film photographers seeking warm, vibrant, and sharp images. Its distinct character and affordable price point make it a great alternative to other films, and I highly recommend giving it a try.
Thoughts
In addition to my positive experience with Kodak 100D film, I hope that Kodak will continue to release new films or even bring back discontinued types like Kodachrome or E100VS. However, in today’s world, where cost management and KPIs drive decision-making, it may not be financially feasible for Kodak to pursue these less profitable opportunities.
If you’ve never shot with colour reversal film before, I highly recommend giving it a try. Seeing the original colours on the film strip always brings me joy. Plus, if you’re a fan of the colour palette from the 80s or the vintage look of film, shooting 100D at night can replicate that essence with its green and cool tones.
Looking forward, I can’t wait to shoot more Kodak 100D on my next trip and experiment with different techniques to produce even better results. I will be sharing my tips on shooting slide film in a separate post, so stay tuned for that. Overall, I’m excited to see where my journey with Kodak 100D film takes me and highly recommend it to any film photographer looking for warm, vibrant, and sharp images.
Check out my webstore below if you want to try some Kodak 100D!
Photography Techniques and Skills
Looking for Cameras / Lenses or Gears?
Support this Community
Recent Posts
Leica Noctilux 35mm f/1.2 ASPH Review: Chasing That Familiar Magic
Thypoch Simera 21mm f/1.4 Review — A Fast, Affordable 21mm for Environmental Portraits and Street
Thypoch Simera 75mm f/1.4 Lens Review – A Great Entry Point Into 75mm
Best Places for Street Photography in Hong Kong: Mong Kok
Contax G Hologon 16mm f/8 Review – Learning to See in Ultra Wide
Best Places for Street Photography in Hong Kong: Sham Shui Po
5 Comments
Leave a comment
Why are you so sure it’s different film stock?
They aren’t. You think people would just go on the internet and lie?
Hey there, thanks for taking the time to comment! I did refer to the colour charts before writing this, and yes, they appear very similar. However, based on the film stripes, I personally observed subtle differences, and that’s what I focused on in my writing. I even consulted with a local photo lab beforehand, and they shared a similar perspective on the printed results. That being said, I appreciate your point and I’ve updated the article to clarify that both films share the same color stock listing.
Blogging about photography is an ongoing journey of exploration for me, and I know I won’t get everything right. I appreciate you giving me the opportunity to clarify, and I’ll continue to test, learn, and share my candid insights here.
The motion picture stock E100D 5294 and Regular Ektachrome E100 are the same film stock packaged differently.
There is no performance difference. Ive verified this with color charting. Stop spreading misinformation.
Hey there, thanks for taking the time to comment! I did refer to the colour charts before writing this, and yes, they appear very similar. However, based on the film stripes, I personally observed subtle differences, and that’s what I focused on in my writing. I even consulted with a local photo lab beforehand, and they shared a similar perspective on the printed results. That being said, I appreciate your point and I’ve updated the article to clarify that both films share the same color stock listing.
Blogging about photography is an ongoing journey of exploration for me, and I know I won’t get everything right. I appreciate you giving me the opportunity to clarify, and I’ll continue to test, learn, and share my candid insights here.